What is the best way to spend time with your friends during a sleepover? Playing an absurd and ridiculous party game, of course. Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect are two popular card-based party games that many people love very much these days. Which one is better? You can find out below.
Continue reading below to find out more about:
– How Cards Against Humanity and Personally Incorrect are played
– The initial impressions of these party games
– Whether these games have good repeatability or not
– The available expansions packs on each game
– The cons of Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect
– Which party game that is generally more recommended
What is Cards Against Humanity?
Cards Against Humanity is described by the maker as “a party game for horrible people.” It is designed for people aged at least 17 years old and over. This is because the content can be quite vulgar and insensitive at times. But it is also really funny, with a wealth of pop culture topics and outrageous cards. It is also really easy to play.
This game is not for people who are easily offended, or people who may have certain antipathy against possibly offending jokes. But it can be great for people who just want to have some great laughs while taking things easy. This game is filled with ridiculous and despicable jokes that will light up your night.
Cards Against Humanity is quite simple. First-timers will quickly understand the rules and follow the flow of the game. For people who are already familiar with the basics, there are ways to twist and spice up the rules.
First of all, each player draws ten white cards. Then, one person is chosen as the Card Czar, who should take a black card. The Card Czar reads the fill-in-the-blank phrase or question on the black card, and the other players must provide a white card, face down, to the Card Czar to fill the phrase or answer the question. Note that some black cards may require two white cards instead of one.
Next, the Card Czar shares every card combination by re-reading the black card with the white card. Finally, the Card Czar picks the funniest play, and the player who submitted it gets one Awesome Point – this scoring mechanism is a notable difference between Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect. The winner of the round becomes the next Card Czar. Everybody else draws back up to ten white cards to start a new round.
The official ceremonial ending is by playing the “Make a Haiku” black card. This black card should be reserved for the end of the game. Each player picks three of their white cards to construct a haiku, but there’s no need for rhyming. The player with the most Awesome Points wins the game.
One standard pack consists of 100 black cards, 500 white cards, plus a copy of the game guide. The cards are thick and coated. The game guide is simple and easy to understand, and includes several alternative rules.
Cards Against Humanity: First Impression
At first, Cards Against Humanity doesn’t look intimidating at all. The black cards are innocuous. It is the white cards that range from work-safe silly to absurdly offensive. The players are free to be as safe or offensive as they like.
New players won’t have any problem in picking up the game. A new player won’t take more than a single round to understand the concept, so this is one of the easier party games to pick up. There is no learning curve. A new player has as much chance to win as everyone else.
In the first few games, Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect is definitely hilarious. The answers are often shockingly funny. There is a chance that a player doesn’t get any good white cards to respond to the black card, but this is quite rare. More often than not, the players are creative enough to make awesome combinations.
Nevertheless, to make Cards Against Humanity a fun experience for everybody, you need to gauge the limits of your group. It is obviously not designed to be appropriate for every crowd. You may need to pay attention to who is around before pulling out this game. It may be unsuitable for people with a more delicate humor sense.
Cards Against Humanity: Repeatability and Expansions
With 100 black cards and 500 white cards, Cards Against Humanity has good repeatability. You can play it multiple times and still get new, fresh experiences. The cards are really diverse and creative. As long as you are playing with the right group, and the players have a similar humor sense, and everyone knows that nothing in the game is to be taken seriously, this game can be played for a long time.
However, it will eventually become stale once you get to know most of the cards. It is no longer funny if you have heard the jokes and responses several times before. This should take a fairly long time, though.
Fortunately, there are several expansion packs available. You should consider getting one of them if you don’t want to be limited to the standard set. There are:
– The Color Packs. There are Red, Blue, and Green packs. Each of them adds about 300 new cards. They are the older expansions, and contain more general jokes.
– The Holiday Packs. They are the cheapest, but they don’t contain many cards. Each pack only has about 30 new cards. So, they can be good for stocking, but they won’t really add much to the game.
– The Specialty Packs. Each pack here has a specific theme. They are also quite cheap, and each contains only about 30 new cards. However, they can be great for specific groups. Some of these packs are the Period Pack, Pride Pack, Weed Pack, 90s Nostalgia Pack, Theatre Pack, and Sci-Fi Pack.
Cards Against Humanity: Pros and Cons
To sum it up, here’s the pros and cons of Cards Against Humanity.
– Very easy to understand, even for totally new players
– Can be really funny and hilarious
– Alternative rules to twist and spice up the game
– The standard pack already comes with lots of cards
– Many expansion pack options
– May be a bit too vulgar or offensive for some people
– May become stale once you get to know most of the cards
What is Personally Incorrect?
Personally Incorrect is pretty much similar to Cards Against Humanity. However, this one has been intentionally made to be even more offensive. The cards are really vulgar and even gross. This game is only for mature people of at least 18 years old or over. This is not for family game nights.
If Cards Against Humanity requires you to pay attention to who is around, Personally Incorrect requires you to be even more careful. Each round is designed to offend a player. So, this game is not for people who easily get offended, and not for people who don’t find offensive jokes funny. It can be good if all players know not to take things seriously.
One notable difference of Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect is the design of the question card. In Personally Incorrect, every question card has an “insert name” section where the reader has to pick the name of a player, excluding themselves. So, each round in Personally Incorrect is meant to attack a player.
At the beginning of the game, every player draws 10 answer cards. One player is chosen to be the question reader, and takes one question card. Everyone else provides an answer card.
Another difference between Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect is the voting mechanism. In Personally Incorrect, at the end of each round, players are required to vote for the most “appropriately inappropriate” answer. They can’t vote for themselves. The question reader may choose the winner of the round when there is a voting tie.
The next reader is the last reader’s left. In other words, the question reader position is moved in a clockwise direction. This will ensure that everyone gets a turn.
The standard rule only includes 10 question cards, so there are only 10 rounds in a standard game. But people may use as many question cards as they like to extend the game. The winner is the player with the highest score; if there is a tie, an extra round is played with only the tied players to determine the winner.
One standard pack consists of 98 question cards and 291 answer cards. There is also a copy of the game guideline included. However, this guide only explains the basic rules without any alternative to spice things up.
Personally Incorrect: First Impression
Personally Incorrect can be funny, but only when played with the right people. The vulgar and sometimes gross nature of the game means that it requires a certain level of humor sense to be enjoyed. It can be suitable for mature teenagers and adults. More importantly, the players should keep in mind not to take things seriously in the game.
The jokes in Personally Incorrect are sometimes cringe-worthy. Some of them are utterly funny, but some others are just plain bad. Again, it depends on the group’s humor sense. The way that you need to insert a name in each question card will make you play differently in every round, depending on whose name is being played.
This is why Personally Incorrect is quite a situational game. Sometimes, players may be tempted to keep using the same name for most of the rounds. It probably won’t be enjoyable for that particular player, even if they do know that the game is just for fun.
The voting mechanism for the scoring is not really good. Well, this is to ensure that the winner of the round is chosen in a fair manner, instead of the subjective valuation of the question reader. However, in many party games, voting quickly becomes a dull, time-consuming thing. When playing an extended game, the voting mechanism may quickly turn it into a boring thing which everyone just wants to get over with as quickly as possible.
Personally Incorrect: Repeatability and Expansions
Personally Incorrect has far fewer cards in the standard pack. With just 98 question cards and 291 answer cards, there is some repeatability, but not as much as Cards Against Humanity. You will get to know most of the cards more quickly.
It is not for everyone, so it is more difficult to become a staple in your game nights. Playing it too frequently may make you feel really dirty. But it can be fun to be played every once in a while.
Personally Incorrect is a relatively newer game, so this game doesn’t have as many expansion packs as Cards Against Humanity yet. Currently, there is just one expansion pack, which is called the Yellow Expansion Pack. It has 35 new question cards and 95 new answer cards. They are mostly general jokes. It is really good for expanding the game and bringing in new experience.
There is no specialty expansion pack that focuses on a specific niche. However, the maker of the game is actively developing new cards, so you can expect more expansion packs in the future.
Personally Incorrect: Pros and Cons
To sum it up, here’s the pros and cons of Personally Incorrect.
– Can be really funny and ridiculous
– Inserting names can make the rounds even more interesting
– Great for people with a similar level of humor sense
– More vulgar and offensive, not suitable for everyone
– The voting mechanism can be dull and annoying
– The standard pack has fewer cards
– Only one expansion pack currently available
Cards Against Humanity vs Personally Incorrect
|Brand||Cards Against Humanity||Personally Incorrect|
|Key features||- Cards Against Humanity is a party game for horrible people. - Now version 2.0! Over 150 new cards since the last version. - Contains 500 white cards and 100 black cards for maximum replayability. - Includes a booklet of sensible game rules and preposterous alternate rules.||- Adult Party Game Where Players Strive to find the Most Appropriately Inappropriate Answer - Game Design Makes Sure Personally Incorrect Stays Funny After Repeated Plays - Party Card Game with Unique Voting Mechanic and Quick Rounds bringing a refreshing Twist on the Genre - Ages 18+ 2-10 Players Playtime 20 Minutes|
|Best Offer||Save Money Please click here||Save Money Please click here|
All in all, between these two party games, Cards Against Humanity is generally better and more recommended. It can be really funny, and although it can be vulgar, it doesn’t always take things to an extreme level. It can be enjoyed by a wider range of people. Also, the standard pack has more cards, and there are many expansion packs to choose from. So, the repeatability is better.